Why Now Is the Time for Organ-on-Chip Companies to Step Up and Lead the Human-Based Research Revolution
- Henning Mann
- Jul 22
- 4 min read
Updated: Aug 18
Henning Mann, PhD, HM.BioConsulting
Ā
šØĀ The Policy Shift We've Been Waiting For
In 2025, the FDA, in collaboration with the National Institutes of Health (NIH), announced a transformative pivot: they will prioritize human-relevant research technologiesāsuch as New Methodology Approaches (NAMs)/ Organ-on-chip (OoC) platformsāover traditional animal models for biomedical innovation (https://www.youtube.com/live/vz1uF42wnKQ). Backed by a key agency like the Government Accountability Office (GAO), this isn't a theoretical trend. It's now policy, funding priority, and scientific expectation.
For OoC companies, this is the momentĀ to step forward, redefine translational relevance, and take command of an accelerating market opportunity.
š§ NIH, FDA, GAO, BIO, and KOLs: Major Forces Aligning in Favor of Organ-on-Chip Technologies:
NIH Policy (2025):Ā Prioritizes non-animal, human-relevant modelsĀ for future grant funding (NIH Policy announcement).
FDA Roadmap (2025):Ā Laid out a structured plan to reduce reliance on animal models, encouraging use of NAMs for preclinical systems that reflect true human biologyĀ (FDA: Roadmap to reducing animal testing in preclinical safety studies and FDA to phase out animal testing for mAbs and other Drugs).
GAO Report (2025): Urges the FDA to scale its efforts in validating and implementing alternatives to animal testing, citing microphysiological systems (MPS) like OoCs as essential tools (GAO-25-107335). However, it also identified several challenges to the development and adoption of OoC technologies.
Recent peer-reviewed studies (e.g., PMID: 40316753Ā and PMID: 40086787) confirm that OoC models not only rival animal models in predictive accuracy but also outperform them in complex tissue modeling, thereby encouraging the use of NAMs for more human-relevant safety assessments.
With the Biotechnology Innovation Organization (@BIO) supporting broader adoption, another key group, reaching into most industry hubs across all US states, is pushing for the adoption of these innovative technologies. However, they also highlight concerns about regulatory harmonization and clinical translatability, requesting guidance and collaboration between industry and regulatory agencies to increase adoption.
Altogether, this is not just a pivot in philosophy ā it's a redefinition of how the U.S. will fund, validate, and translate biomedical research.
𧬠Whoās Leading the Charge?
Forward-looking OoC companies are already gaining traction with regulators, investors, and the pharma/biotech ecosystem. A selection of leading innovators includes:
Emulate, MIMETAS, CN Bio, TissUse, AIM Biotech, InSphero, Altis Biosystems, HesperosĀ
And more, all of which can be reviewed on the 3R Collaborative Tech Hub
This cohort isnāt just innovating; theyāre working on redefining preclinical research itself.
ā ļøĀ The Challenge: Adoption in the Market.
While the Technology may seem ready, Validation is still ongoing.
Over the past decade, OoC systems have evolved from conceptual innovations to platforms,Ā which have been validated for simulating key human functions. Yet despite this scientific maturity, many platforms still lack fully validated data sets, including clear predictability scores, which hampers their market penetration.
The challenges now lie with:
1) Finding the Context-of-Use (#COU) niche where those innovative technologies may bring a significant gain in predicting clinical trial outcomes.
2) Defining where in the drug development process their tool most efficientlyĀ complements existing in vitro and in vivo assays. Pricing and scalability positions vendors in different spots on the drug developmentĀ time line, depending on cost, complexity and scalability.
3)Ā Executionāpositioning, partnerships, and scale. Lastly, industry-wide standardization in hardware and readout compatibility is becoming increasingly important.
Where the real opportunity lies is in closing the gap between scientific promise and market impact: many companies risk being strategically unpreparedĀ with misaligned positioning, suboptimal commercialization strategies, and weak messaging on the value of human-relevant data to pharma and industry users, regulators, and investors.
Being technically strong is no longer enough. Market readinessāfrom regulatory alignment to investor and client/user narrativesāis the new frontier.
šĀ What OoC Companies Should Be Doing Right NowĀ / How HM.BioConsulting Can Help You Win the Moment
As a business development consultancy built with decades-long combined experience in the preclinical industry - including OoC ā HM.BioConsulting is an accelerant for OoC innovators. The team at HM.BioConsulting has deep scientific and commercial rootsĀ in the very technologies now at the forefront of regulatory and investor focus, combining experience in OoC sciences with strategic business development expertise. We help companies:
Align your roadmapĀ with NIH/ FDA/ EMEA validation expectations
Secure strategic partnerships with CROs, pharma, and agencies.
Navigate complex and long regulatory landscapesĀ for toxicity / safety/ efficacy applications
Pursue pharmacological validation of their models to show clear gains compared to the current state-of-the-art assays.
Develop scalable go-to-market plans and licensing paths, and craft compelling arguments that resonate with investors and pharma.
Develop your sales narrative, pipeline, and revenue
Position clearly in a crowded and fast-moving field
Translate your tech into a fundable, scalable business
Craft compelling narrativesĀ for non-dilutive funding, co-development, and M&A
Communicate human-relevance and translational value to funders and end-users
Without the right business development approach, even the best platforms risk being overshadowed in this rapidly advancing field.
šĀ Why Now? Because Timing is Everything
We're at a historic inflection point. NIH is setting new standards. The FDA is laying out pathways. Venture and pharma funding will be directed toward human-relevant platforms. The OoC space is fertile ground for the future of translational science.
The question isnāt ifĀ organ-on-chip will replace animal testingāitās whoĀ will own that future.
š Learn how HM BioConsulting can help you seize the momentum: www.hmbioconsulting.com
š Sources and Further Reading
NIH Prioritizes Human-Based Technologies (2025): NIH Announcement
GAO Report (2025): FDA Should Enhance Support for Non-animal Methods
FDA Roadmap (2025): Reducing Animal Testing in Preclinical Studies (PDF)
Peer-reviewed Studies: PMID: 40316753, PMID: 40086787
Scispot: Top 20 Most Innovative OoC Companies
FDA Roundtable (2025): YouTube Live Panel Discussion
Ā
#OrganOnChip #MicrophysiologicalSystems #HumanRelevantResearch #NonAnimalTesting #NAM #FDA #NIH #GAO #DrugDevelopment #TranslationalScience #BiomedicalInnovation #3rs #3RCollaborative #BIO#EmulateBio #Mimetas #CNBio #Hesperos #TissUse #HumimicChip #AIMBiotech #AltisBiosystems#BiotechStrategy #BiotechFunding #BiotechConsulting#HM.BioConsulting #HMBioConsulting #LifeSciencesStrategy #FutureOfResearch


Comments